Cases 71 - 80 of 262
Salary v. Cardona, et al
as 14-3170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK T.J. SALARY
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICIA CARDONA, Psychiatrist, Lansing Correctional Facility, HOWARD ANDERSON, Mental Health Professional, Lansing Correctional Facility, CHERI JAYNES, TRU Program Manager, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Beauclair (ID 74638) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2014cv03146
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Beauclair
Defendant:
C. Gordon Harrod, Ray Roberts, James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: White
as 14-3155
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY BRUCE WHITE
Respondent:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RAY ROBERTS and DEREK SCHMIDT
Beauclair (ID 74638) v. Cochran et al
as 5:2014cv03128
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Beauclair
Defendant:
(fnu) Cochran, Ray Roberts and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2014cv03112
Petitioner:
Jonathan S. Nelson
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Ray Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor (ID 50506) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014cv03110
Petitioner:
Curtis Taylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Roberts, et al
as 14-3121
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN B. DAVIS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS and STEVE KOBACH
Matson v. Hrabe
as 14-3110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE C. MATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL HRABE, Deputy Warden, Norton Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
JAY SHELTON, RAY ROBERTS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Jones (ID 86916) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014cv03075
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Jones
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Sam Cline, D. Gorges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Perry et al
as 5:2014hc02091
Petitioner:
Norman Ray Roberts, III
Respondent:
Frank L. Perry and Sorrell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
