Cases 71 - 80 of 742
Estate of Richard Matus, Jr. et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Estate of Richard Matus, Jr., G.M., a minor, by and through Guardian Ad Litem, Lisa Matus, R.M., a minor, by and through Guardian Ad Litem, Lisa Matus and others
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a public entity, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laurie Reynolds v. US
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURIE REYNOLDS
Plaintiff:
CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Letricia Lavern Brown v. The State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Letricia Lavern Brown
Defendant:
SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, INC., erroneously sued herein as LOS ANGELES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, The State of California, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gerri Hood v. US
as 23-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERRI F. HOOD
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Barbara Mast v. US
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA MAST
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Christina Anderson v. US
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA ANDERSON
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Alan Meddows v. US
as 23-1272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN MEDDOWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Beatrice Rivera Adams v. US
as 23-1271
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS and BEATRICE RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
