Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Gleason v. Neuschmid
as 2:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Stanley Gleason
Defendant:
R. Neuschmid, C. Mayer, C. Cosyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagsby v. Fox
as 3:2018cv00434
Petitioner:
Leonard Bagsby
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesus Arnett v. Robert Fox
as 17-73321
Petitioner:
JESUS L. ARNETT
Respondent:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
Travis Elliott v. Robert Fox
as 17-73282
Petitioner:
TRAVIS NEAL ELLIOTT
Respondent:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
Purdy v. Fox et al
as 2:2017cv02518
Plaintiff:
Jihad Al-hakim Purdy
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Rhinehart, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shah v. Fox
as 5:2017cv06737
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox
Petitioner:
Jay Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, WV et al
as 2:2017cv04214
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, D. Lane McMillion, Dale L. McMillion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Douglas Yim v. Robert Fox
as 17-17162
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS K. YIM
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 17-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Elias v. Kinross et al
as 2:2017cv02106
Plaintiff:
Keiron M. Elias
Defendant:
J. Kinross, S. Gilliam, J. Appleberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
