Cases 71 - 80 of 5,724
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01748
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Wilkinson v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Gary Wilkinson
Defendant:
Clifton Roberson and Smith County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Wells Fargo N.A. et al
as 5:2024cv00754
Defendant:
Wellington Risk Insurance Agency, Inc., Wellington Claim Service, Inc., GEICO Insurance Agency LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Smith and Kelly Smith
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)
Anniston et al v. Manir Properties 3, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Defendant:
Manir Properties 3, LLC doing business as Comfort Inn Suites - El Paso Airport, Ruth Ann Smith and 7 Hills El Paso, LLC
Plaintiff:
Irma Almeida Bustillos, Yadilh Yaneth Anniston, W.AL.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Welch v. Steady Fleet Logistics et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Defendant:
Steady Fleet Logistics and Bhavdip Gordhan Bhayani
Plaintiff:
Kristen Lechelle Welch
Pretrial Service:
Bruce A Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Gbegan v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv02486
Plaintiff:
Denakpon Gbegan
Defendant:
Edward Charles Smith and Apollo Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Smith v. Warden Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00260
Respondent:
Warden Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reaves v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent:
Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Smith
as 3:2024cv01631
Petitioner:
Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
