Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Malloy et al v. SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Edgar H. Malloy and Edgar W. Malloy
Defendant:
SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montesano v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Teresa Montesano
Defendant:
American Optical Corporation, Trane US, Inc., Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kostal et al v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00789
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, General Refractories Company, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Kostal and Rosemary Kostal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv69122
Defendant:
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ARVA ANDERSON and JOSEPH ALEXANDER ANDERSON, JR
Petitioner:
ALDRICH PUMPS CAMERON DRESSER-RAND IDP PUMPS FIER-BATH PUMPS TERRY STEAM TURBINE WESTERN LAND ROLLER IRRIGATION PUMPS and WILSON SNYDER PUMPS
Interested Party:
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY and COPELAND CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Box et al v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Defendant:
Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Box, Kermit Francis and Keith Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2006cv00741
Defendant:
Utah Power & Light Company, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Anderson, Jr and Arva Anderson
Interested Party:
Copeland Corp and Kaiser Gypsum Company
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Evelyn J. Furse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
