Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Pickens v. McRae et al
as 5:2016ct03331
Plaintiff: Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant: James McRae, Tony Lowery, Davy Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICKENS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2016cv01358
Plaintiff: BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant: ROBERT C. LEWIS, W. DAVID GUICE, SCOTLAND COUNTY/MUNICIPALITY/LAURINBURG, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01093
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant: SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01068
Plaintiff: SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant: CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant: SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICKENS v. SHANAHAN et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff: BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant: KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, W. DAVID GUICE, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRENCH v. N.C. PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff: KENNETH J. FRENCH
Defendant: N.C. PRISON SYSTEM and SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WA SALAAM v. SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION
as 1:2016cv00184
Petitioner: SULYAMAN WA SALAAM
Respondent: SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCELROY v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2015cv00945
Plaintiff: ARTHUR MCELROY
Defendant: SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2015cv00656
Plaintiff: RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant: SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?