Cases 71 - 80 of 129
Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 1:2014cv04811
Petitioner:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Respondent:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cox v. Wilson et al
as 8:2014cv04002
Plaintiff:
Paul Leslie Cox
Defendant:
Allen Wilson and South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Douglas, Jr. v. Warden Dunlap
as 14-7388
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES OSCAR DOUGLAS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN DUNLAP, Walden Correctional Institution
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF
Robert Smart v. SC Dept. of Probation Parole
as 14-7227
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE SMART
Respondent - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2014cv02441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of and South Carolina Taxpayers, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Charleston County General Sessions Court et al
as 1:2014cv01956
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wright El
Defendant:
Charleston County General Sessions Court and South Carolina United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast v. South Carolina, The State of
as 0:2014cv00788
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Arbogast
Respondent:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. Hayes et al
as 8:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gordon
Defendant:
John C Hayes, III and South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 1:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dale Tolliver
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Spartanburg, The County of, M Hope Blackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.