Cases 71 - 80 of 285
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
TIM HOOPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M Occupational Safety LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv05310
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nycole Robinson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv05214
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kitzler v. Hooper
as 23-30595
Petitioner / Appellant:
Aaron Kitzler
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cotton v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cotton
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Hooper
as 23-30571
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Osborne, et al v. Hooper et al
as 3:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Elena Osborne
Defendant:
Warden Tim Hooper, Randy Lavespere, Ashli Oliveaux and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Edwards v. New Orleans Police Department, et al
as 2:2023cv03353
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Bradley Scott, Tracey Flemming Davillier, Theoplus Kent and others
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Postal Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Hooper
as 23-30495
Petitioner / Appellant:
Donald Logan, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
