Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Anderson v. Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court et al
as 7:2013cv02354
Petitioner:
Reginald Levon Anderson
Respondent:
Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County Jail, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court et al
as 7:2013cv02353
Petitioner:
Reginald Levon Anderson
Respondent:
Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dodd v. Bailey et al
as 7:2013cv01151
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Dodd
Defendant:
Eric F Bailey, Collard, Tuscaloosa County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv04089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
L.G. v. Antonio Bostic
as 12-11819
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAQUARIUS GRAY, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Toniko L. Alexander
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO BOSTIC, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff for Tuscaloosa County, AL
:
SERVICE
DeJourney v. Samples et al
as 7:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
Randall L DeJourney
Defendant:
Samples and Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Tuscaloosa County Jail
as 7:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Donnie Eugene Mills
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
