Cases 71 - 80 of 436
Optimus Steel, LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2020cv00374
Defendant:
Jefferson Southern Star Pipeline, LLC, Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite (in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail (in his official capacity as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Galvevston District Commander and others
Plaintiff:
Optimus Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Bayou City Waterkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Colonel Timothy Vail, Lieutenant Todd T Semonite, Secretary Ryan McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2042
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILD VIRGINIA, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL PATRICK V. KINSMAN, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM T. WALKER, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2039
Petitioner:
INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent:
COLONEL JASON A. EVERS, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1263
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CHANTELL SACKETT and MICHAEL SACKETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT and others
Petitioner:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1262
Intervenor Defendant:
NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CHANTELL SACKETT and MICHAEL SACKETT
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT and others
Petitioner:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1238
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, R.D. JAMES, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and others
Intervenor Defendant:
U.S. POULTRY & EGG ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, LEADING BUILDERS OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SACKETT, CHANTELL SACKETT and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
The Coalition to Protect Puget v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 20-35701
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, JOHN G. BUCK, Colonel, in his official capacity as Commander of the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC and TAYLOR SHELLFISH COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT, a non-profit corporation
Center for Food Safety v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 20-35702
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NISBET OYSTER CO., INC. and PACIFIC COAST SHELLFISH GROWERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARK A. GERALDI, Colonel, in his Official Capacity as Commander of the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, a non-profit corporation
Center for Food Safety v. Pacific Coast Shellfish Grower, et al
as 20-35547
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NISBET OYSTER CO., INC. and PACIFIC COAST SHELLFISH GROWERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, an agency of the United States of America, TODD T. SEMONITE, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, SCOTT A. SPELLMON, Brigadier General, in his official capacity as Commander of the Northwestern Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, a non-profit corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
