Cases 71 - 80 of 13,017
Williams Jr. et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Andy Williams Jr. and Tyrone Muhammad
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Brandon F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jason C Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America Attorney General, United States Postal Service, Nube C Urizar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Tounisi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Abdella Ahmad Tounisi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grande, Jr. v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
ROY GRANDE, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Thomas v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Carl E Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. Wordlow
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Marvetta Wordlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Dickey
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tracie Dickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. Gold Hands Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Gold Hands Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
