Cases 71 - 80 of 3,552
USA v. 452 Routt Drive, Loveland, Colorado
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
452 Routt Drive, Loveland, Colorado
Claimant:
Neal Wohlmuth
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. $10,000.00 Seized From JP Morgan Chase Account #1964105499
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$10,000.00 Seized From JP Morgan Chase Account #1964105499
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Berumen v. Godinez et al
as 1:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
Aracely Berumen
Defendant:
Alison Godinez, Plan De Salud Del Valle, Inc. doing business as Salud Family Health Centers and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
USA v. 17,082.3565 Tether USD (USDT)
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
17,082.3565 TETHER USD (USDT)
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
