Cases 71 - 80 of 1,324
Tsvik v. Medley et al
as 1:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Tetyana Tsvik
Defendant:
BYANCA G. MEDLEY, PV Holding Corp., Rasier LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Davis v. Dos Santos et al
as 4:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Davis
Defendant:
Eliezer Dos Santos, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
M.G. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01727
Plaintiff:
M.G.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
A.M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schwab v. Vo
as 3:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Jason Schwab
Defendant:
Hoang Ngoc Vo and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Seastrand v. Oguz et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Leonora Michelle Seastrand
Defendant:
Firat Oguz, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
K. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
K. K.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
N. A.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MELENDEZ v. DAI et al
as 2:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAJAIRA MELENDEZ
Defendant:
DALIANG DAI, RASIER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
