Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Chase v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2012cv11182
Plaintiff:
Robert Chase
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Michael King
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Torres v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv10886
Plaintiff:
Rosa Torres
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Salafia v. Brackley et al
as 4:2012cv40053
Plaintiff:
Kendra J Salafia
Defendant:
Jean E. Brackley and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Quinones v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2012cv10120
Plaintiff:
Ana Quinones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mitura Fishing Corp. and Halina Mitura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv40224
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Brown
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Zottoli-Millbrook Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Clapp v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2011cv10345
Plaintiff:
Thomas W Clapp
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Paul W. Sullivan Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv30171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oppenheimer v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2010cv11298
Plaintiff:
Bradley Oppenheimer
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Libby v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2010cv11278
Plaintiff:
Marylou Libby
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
National Postal Mailhandlers' Union, Local 301, AFL-CIO v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2010cv11276
Petitioner:
National Postal Mailhandlers' Union, Local 301, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
