Cases 71 - 80 of 82
IADANZA et al v. MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2009cv00734
Plaintiff:
JODY IADANZA, JODY IADANZA, DAVID IADANZA and others
Defendant:
MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL and ANDREW L. SPERGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramirez v. Susquehanna Health System et al
as 4:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Doris Ramirez
Defendant:
Susquehanna Health System, Muncy Valley Hospital, David E. Kahler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROSE v. ROTHROCK et al
as 5:2008cv03884
Plaintiff:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant:
BRUCE ROTHROCK, DAVID ROTHROCK and LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITALITY GROUP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DATIZ v. LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv02803
Plaintiff:
LUZ DATIZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC. and LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AIRGAS-EAST, INC. v. GT & S, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
AIRGAS-EAST, INC., AIRGAS-EAST, INC. and AIRGAS-EAST, INC.
Defendant:
GT & S, INC., LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC. and LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
VISICU, INC. v. IMDSOFT, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv04562
Plaintiff:
VISICU, INC.
Defendant:
IMDSOFT, LTD. and LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
