Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01744
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv04760
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER VASQUEZ
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE, VICENT BROADNAX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04351
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VASQUEZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03530
Plaintiff: LYNDA VASQUEZ
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02759
Petitioner: FALIPE VASQUEZ
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02271
Plaintiff: INDU PATEL
Defendant: CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
VASQUEZ v. FRANKLIN MILLS MALL et al
as 2:2014cv02229
Plaintiff: DIANE VASQUEZ
Defendant: FRANKLIN MILLS MALL, SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. , SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vasquez-Algarin v. USA
as 1:2014cv00502
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Melvin Vasquez-Algarin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00454
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VASQUEZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Plaintiff: EDWIN VASQUEZ
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?