Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Dailey v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv01557
Plaintiff:
Julian Dailey
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Anthony Amato, Victor Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Milan v. Martin
as 1:2011cv00638
Petitioner:
Victor Rivera-Milan
Respondent:
M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Victor Rivera, et al v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.
as 11-17365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR RIVERA RIVERA, ERNESTO SEBASTIAN CASTILLO RIOS, VICENTE CORNEJO LUGO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PERI & SONS FARMS, INC.
Rivera Pino v. Holder
as 11-2893
Petitioner:
Secundo Victor Rivera Pino
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Rivera-Rodriguez v. USA
as 5:2011cv00050
Petitioner:
Victor Rivera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez, Victor Rivera-Perez, Felis Alvares-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera et al v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Aguilar Solano, Martin Flores Bravo, Pedro Rivera Camacho and others
Defendant:
Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez
as 3:2011cv01041
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez , Jorge O. Mojica-Vega , Victor Rivera-Percy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero-Galindez v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv02164
Plaintiff:
Angel Romero-Galindez
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez, Ana Lopez-Rodriguez, Jorge O. Mojica-Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Crespo v. Molina-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv02133
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rivera-Crespo
Defendant:
Carlos Molina-Rodriguez, Victor Rivera-Percy and FNU Morales-Neftali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
