Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,055
Martin v. Kabia et al
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff: Ricardo Martin
Defendant: Nurse Kabia, Nursh Sillah, Jashua Suerdick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00854
Plaintiff: Christopher Sue Martin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Gray
as 4:2023cv00388
Petitioner: Terrell Martin
Respondent: Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin-Trussell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff: BRANDI MARTIN-TRUSSELL
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00703
Plaintiff: Angela Martin
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lucas v. The City of Reynoldsburg et al
as 2:2023cv00689
Plaintiff: rebecca lucas
Defendant: THE CITY OF REYNOLDSBURG, Officer Nicholas RUBENSTAH and officer Ryan Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff: Robert E Martin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv00459
Petitioner: William E Martin, II
Respondent: Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Terrazas, Jr. v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff: Martin Terrazas, Jr.
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?