Cases 71 - 80 of 4,167
Dean v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Silena M. Dean
Defendant:
Kimberly L. Williams, Lifestyle Trucking, Inc. and Concordant Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Juanita Williams
Defendant:
HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Obechang et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jon Lenoska Johnson
Defendant:
Kristin Obechang, Chandler Caldwell, William Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Norman
Defendant:
Karen Williams, Ventress Correctional Facility and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
