Cases 71 - 80 of 4,000
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #054 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
John Doe #054
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #051 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
John Doe #051
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. MANPOWER US INC., et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Jerrelle Williams
Defendant:
Manpower US Inc. doing business as Experis US, Inc., First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. doing business as First Citizens National Bank and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Doe #50 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Doe #50
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #53 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #53
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bass v. Larsen et al
as 2:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
William Bass
Defendant:
Robert Edwin Larsen, Kivi Bros Trucking, Inc. and Derek J. Kivi
Not Yet Classified:
Sam Rainwaters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
