Cases 71 - 80 of 111
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. LOFIG, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv07608
Defendant:
LOFIG, INC., KEVIN E. FITZGERALD and DANA G. FITZGERALD
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN et al
as 2:2010cv07410
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN, ROGER D. NAAMAN and EDGAR THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. CINO OF TAMPA BAY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05904
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
CINO OF TAMPA BAY, INC., BRADLEY HUTCHINSON and SHAWN PALLUTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. NOBLE et al
as 2:2009cv05212
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. NOBLE, WENDY R. NOBLE and 3N AUTO PAINTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. AUGUSTIN et al
as 2:2009cv04548
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
PIERRE PHILIPPE AUGUSTIN, VIRGINIE L. AUGUSTIN and PHIL'S AUTO BODY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Maaco Franchising Inc v. Gentry
as 5:2009mc00015
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising Inc
Defendant:
Randy Gentry
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. GENTRY
as 2:2009cv01298
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
RANDY GENTRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maaco Enterprises, Inc v. Payton et al
as 3:2009mc00002
Plaintiff:
Maaco Enterprises, Inc
Defendant:
William H. Payton, Lily R. Payton and Dawn's Inc
Rollins v. MAACO Inc
as 4:2008cv00753
Plaintiff:
Gregory C Rollins
Defendant:
MAACO Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
