Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 16,126
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv10555
Petitioner: Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent: FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Owl Feather- Gorbey v. District of Columbia et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather- Gorbey, Michael S. Gorbey and Tsunami Khan
Defendant: District of Columbia, D.C Circuit Federal Courts, 2nd Circuit Federal Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Jobson
as 1:2024cv10554
Plaintiff: Lincoln Latham
Defendant: Jose Jobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner: Oscar Rios
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivera v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10534
Petitioner: Miguel A. Rivera
Respondent: Nelson B. Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: Joe J. Baltas
Defendant: Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Carter
as 1:2024cv10496
Petitioner: Patrick Franklin Harris
Respondent: Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montrond v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40032
Petitioner: Pedro Montrond
Respondent: Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. US
as 24-1189
Petitioner: JERMAINE MITCHELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Benbow v. Klaus et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Aaron C. Benbow
Defendant: Richard Klaus, Lt. Panarello, Deputy Warden Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?