Cases 71 - 80 of 30,321
MCCLINTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
DAYONTA MCCLINTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCracken v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard McCracken and Richard James McCracken
Defendant:
William Hyatte and George Payne, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
LANCE WAYNE WALTERS and CARINA
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, SITZMAN, OROZCO-JIMENEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATHER v. HASSLER et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
REGINALD PRATHER
Defendant:
NATHAN HASSLER, JOHN MONTGOMERY, PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardy v. Whitmyer et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Tracey A Hardy and Tracey Arnell Hardy
Defendant:
Andrew Whitmyer, Brian Schroth and Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLEY v. GILMAN et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN WILLEY
Defendant:
TONI GILMAN, PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and PARKE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
