Cases 81 - 90 of 165,094
Bello v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. District Attorney of Harris County, Texas
as 4:2024cv01539
Plaintiff:
LaDorthy Burleson
Defendant:
District Attorney of Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
TDCJ Parole Division, Kenisha Turner and Gail Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pretel v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Francisco Valencia Pretel
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Calzada v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Evelio Calzada
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Najera v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Najera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Nicholas David Mosquera
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Brett Ligon, Law Librarian Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
