Cases 81 - 90 of 11,236
JACOBSEN v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
KAREN JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
DE MORALES v. ALEMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
VANUZIA DE MORALES
Defendant:
SIMON MAYO ALEMAN and AMAYRA FONZ TELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
D.M. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
G. M.
Petitioner:
D. M.
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Sgt. Kyle Krawczyk, Officer Jamison Keltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Avens v. Dixon et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Avens
Defendant:
Faris C. Dixon, Jr., Vidant/ECU Health Medical Center, Dr. Karen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Holley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
