Cases 81 - 90 of 152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Richard Braun et al
as 2:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
Defendant:
Richard Braun an individual and doing business as Amazon com Seller Round n Round and Does 1-10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Mark Fingerman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sellers v. Gipson
as 3:2013cv01017
Petitioner:
Kevin Keith Sellers, II
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Biter et al
as 1:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jasper F. Wilson
Defendant:
M. D. Biter, D Davey, P. Stockman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Goggans v. City of Fullerton et al
as 2:2013cv00980
Defendant:
Officer A. Ciciarelli, Officer A. Ciciarelli, City of Fullerton and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Goggans
Matthew Goggans v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2013cv00243
Defendant:
Officer A. Ciciarelli, Officer A. Ciciarelli, City of Fullerton and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Goggans
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Amazon.com Sellers fastmedia et al
as 2:2013cv00889
Defendant:
Amazon.com Seller ALLSEASONS, Amazon.com Seller B and Wc, Amazon.com Seller Cape Breton and others
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
