Cases 81 - 90 of 126
Graham v. Connectivity Solutions,Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01176
Plaintiff:
Raymond Graham
Defendant:
Connectivity Solutions,Inc., Andy Mortenson, Phil Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schreiber v. Dunabin et al
as 1:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
Graham Schreiber
Defendant:
Ms Lorraine Lesley Dunabin, CentralNic Global Headquarters, Network Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Albritton v. Wright et al
as 2:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon Albritton
Defendant:
Edward Wright, Mr. Morgan, Ms. Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Consolidation Coal Company et al
as 1:2012cv00023
Defendant:
CNX Gas Company LLC, CONSOL Energy Inc., Consolidation Coal Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dianna Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Williams v. Mullen et al
as 2:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Graham C. Mullen, William B. Traxler, Raymond A. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham Packaging Company, Inc. v. Doe
as 1:2011mc00041
Plaintiff:
Graham Packaging Company, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Sensabaugh v. Shortt et al
as 7:2011cv00443
Defendant:
Brian J. Brydges, Travis H. Epes, IV, Colin R. Gibb and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Wayne Sensabaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Star v. Director of Medical Services for the Virginia DOC et al
as 3:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Michael Star
Defendant:
Director of Medical Services for the Virginia DOC and Gary Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Star v. Director of Medical Services for the Virginia DOC et al
as 2:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
Michael Star
Defendant:
Director of Medical Services for the Virginia DOC and Gary Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
