Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Horton v. USA
as 4:2010cv00083
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tracy Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Srivastava v. Herz et al
as 3:2010cv00853
Plaintiff: Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant: Marian Herz, Retirement Living, Inc., Donahoe Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00799
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Horton v. USA
as 2:2010cv00161
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Darrell Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Horton v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2010cv00434
Plaintiff: Dallyn K. Horton
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maize et al v. Shaner Trade Center Associates, L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00064
Plaintiff: Ezra Maize and James Horton
Defendant: Walden Security and Shaner Trade Center Associates, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. The Cheatham County Board of Education et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01099
Plaintiff: John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant: The Cheatham County Board of Education, Diane Williams, Michelle Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Horton v. Carlton et al
as 2:2009cv00102
Petitioner: Michael Horton
Respondent: Howard Carlton and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maize et al v. Marriott Hotel et al
as 3:2009cv00081
Plaintiff: Ezra Maize and James Horton
Defendant: Marriott Hotel and Walden Security
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cole v. Memphis Police Department
as 2:2009cv02139
Petitioner: Brandon Cole
Respondent: Dunn, Horton, Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?