Cases 81 - 90 of 280
Harman v. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
as 3:2014cv02014
Plaintiff:
James David Harman
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY v. PACS SWITCHGEAR, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
Defendant:
PACS SWITCHGEAR, LLC and PACS INDUSTRIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv00910
Plaintiff:
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
Defendant:
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Land Star Light Towers et al v. Butters et al
as 4:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Land Star Light Towers and NOVUS Operating, LLC
Defendant:
Gary Butters and Butters Living Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. A.W. MCNABB, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01680
Plaintiff:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
A.W. MCNABB, LLC and DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, EQT PLAZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. HUBBELL LIGHTING, INC.
as 2:2013cv04771
Plaintiff:
ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
HUBBELL LIGHTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
