Cases 81 - 90 of 453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armatas et al v. Pulmonary Physicians, Inc. of Canton, Ohio et al
as 5:2021cv01243
Defendant:
Aultman Hospital, Pulmonary Physicians, Inc. of Canton, Ohio, AultCare Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Armatas, Estate of Alexander E. Armatas and Mr. Steven A. Armatas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cobbeldick et al v. Cuyahoga County Corrections Center et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Frank Golphin, Lawrence Jackson, Charles Jackson and others
Defendant:
Eric Ivey, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney, Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03284
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Diversified Health Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02624
Plaintiff:
Paulette Pierce
Defendant:
Diversified Health Management, Inc. and Alexander Phommasathit
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alexander v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02257
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julie Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02174
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Nicholi Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miklas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01939
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Miklas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buck v. The Kroger Company
as 1:2021cv00279
Defendant:
The Kroger Company
Plaintiff:
Alexander Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01645
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Alexander
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
