Cases 81 - 90 of 137
Santiago v. Patel et al
as 1:2017cv08198
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santiago
Defendant:
Vishnu Patel, Ratifal Patel, Algonquin Gasoline, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neary v. Naqvi
as 17-2876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Christopher R. Neary
Defendant:
Erinn Dolan, M.D., in his individual and official capacities, Lavern A. Wright, M.D., in his individual and official capacities, Peter Murphy, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Monica Farinella, in her individual capacity, Cary Freston, in his individual capacity, Ricardo Ruiz, in his individual capacity and others
USA v. Antonio Santiago-Santiago

as 17-13983
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO SANTIAGO-SANTIAGO
Brown v. Santiago et al

as 3:2017cv01427
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Antonio Santiago, Faucher, David Maiga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Semple et al

as 3:2017cv01328
Plaintiff:
Kenya Brown
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Elizabeth Coursen, Paul Chaplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez-Marin v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2017cv01974
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez-Marin
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Erick Rolon, Wanda Montanez-Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Groomes v. Frazir et al

as 3:2017cv01072
Plaintiff:
Bobby Groomes
Defendant:
Frazir, Wagner, N. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gjini v. Santiago

as 3:2017cv00662
Petitioner:
Gazmen Gjini
Respondent:
Antonio Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sosa v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00610
Petitioner:
Andres R. Sosa
Respondent:
Scott Semple and Antonio Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harnage v. Daly
as 17-984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Daly, C.C., Antonio Santiago and Halloran, Lieutenant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.