Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Adam Jones v. Bath & Body Works, LLC
as 14-80041
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ADAM JONES, individually as an aggrieved employee and on behalf of other aggrieved employees
Defendant - Petitioner:
BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv20590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv50374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Bath & Body Works, LLC v. Zaragoza & Zembrodt, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Bath & Body Works, LLC
Defendant:
Zaragoza & Zembrodt, LLC , Anthony Zembrodt and Robert Zaragoza
Counter_claimant:
Robert Zaragoza , Anthony Zembrodt and Zaragoza & Zembrodt, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Bath & Body Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Target Corporation et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05745
Petitioner:
4sure.com, Inc., Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Mastercard Incorporated, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.