Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 92
FIRST NATIONAL BANK, N.A. v. HAGERMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00065
Defendant: ADVANCED RECOVERY SERVICES, MIKE BOWEN, TINA BOWEN and others
Plaintiff: FIRST NATIONAL BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00167
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
BOWENS v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00052
Petitioner: MICHAEL BOWENS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
BOWEN v. MEIJER, INC.
as 1:2009cv00381
Plaintiff: JOHNNY BOWEN and JOHNNY BOWEN
Defendant: MEIJER, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
LAUER et al v. BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00036
Plaintiff: MIKE LAUER, MIKE LAUER, STEVE YEAGER and others
Defendant: BOWEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION and DOUG BOWEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
DeLange et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00171
Plaintiff: Allan DeLange, Allan DeLange, William Blumm and others
Defendant: Bowen's Decorating Service Inc and Stephen A Bowen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
ROSS v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2008cv00218
Plaintiff: CHARLES ROSS
Defendant: H. MARBERRY, G. TAVARAS, S. DREBES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe v. Bowen Center et al
as 1:2008cv00120
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Bowen Center and Dr Rutten
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?