Cases 81 - 90 of 558
Bryant v. Effingham County Jail
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Benito David Bryant
Defendant:
Effingham County Jail, Effingham Sheriff's Dept. and W. Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Delfidio Perez
Defendant:
Freddie L Bryant, III, Tony B Herring, Jr., Kenneth L Weston, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bryant v. White
as 1:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
Jason Bryant
Respondent:
Jermaine White and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FORD
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR STEPHANIE BRYANT, INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER ELLISON and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCOVEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, AARON PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
