Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Mendez, et al v. The Radec Corp., et al
as 6:2003cv06342
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mendez , Jerry T. Griffo, Jr. , Adrenne R. Secor and others
Defendant:
The Radec Corporation , Mark Shortino , Raymond Shortino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ballard et al v. 121 W. 45th St. Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv00825
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Ballard, Jr.
Defendant:
121 W. 45th St. Restaurant Corp., John Connolly and Bernard C. Reilly
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ballard v. Conway
as 9:2009cv00898
Petitioner:
Devaughn Ballard
Respondent:
James Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ballard v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Diane Ballard
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shuler v. Brown et al
as 9:2007cv00937
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shuler
Defendant:
V. Brown, R.J. Ballard and Dept. Corr. Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuler v. Brown et al
as 1:2007cv07566
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shuler
Defendant:
V. Brown, R.J. Ballard and Dept. Corr. Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. McCluskey et al
as 2:2007cv06870
Plaintiff:
Reena Sheela Cunningham
Defendant:
Sean McCluskey , Thomas Ballard , Mary Halprin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
