Cases 81 - 90 of 4,054
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winkler v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 2:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
Geoff Winkler, J&J Consulting Services, Inc. and J and J Purchasing LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Correos v. Western Progressive - Nevada - Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Harold S Correos
Defendant:
Western Progressive - Nevada - Inc., Nevada Legal News, Home Means Nevada Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Spann et al v. Dimon et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Nicoshalmar Spann and Dayna Spann
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, Jeremy Barnum and Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clark v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Alfred Clark
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Western - Progressive Nevada, Inc., and PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Estrada v. Federal Reserve Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Michael Estrada
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank and Jerome Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prendeville v. Dimon et al
as 2:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
John Prendeville
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, McCarthy Holthus, LLP, Quality Loan Service Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
