Cases 81 - 90 of 732
Ollie McNair v. Terry Bernard, et al
as 17-14750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE MCNAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY E. BERNARD, Chairman, JAMES W. MILLS, Vice Chairman, ALBERT R. MURRAY, Member and others
Christopher Pugh v. United States, et al.
as 17-14658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD WHEELER, Chief, UNITED STATES, MULTIPLE UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS and others
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
Davis v. Owens et al
as 1:2017cv03296
Plaintiff:
Bruce Davis
Defendant:
Brian Owens and Gregory C. Dozier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Patrick Head, et al
as 17-13799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK HEAD, JESSE D. EVANS, MARY E. STALEY and others
Kerlin v. Barnard et al
as 4:2017cv00174
Petitioner:
Mark Kerlin
Respondent:
Terry Barnard, James Mills, Braxton Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rose v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv02778
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Rose
Defendant:
James W. Mills, Terry Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY L BARNARD, JAMES MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
