Cases 81 - 90 of 171
Addison v. Stirling et al
as 8:2020cv03735
Defendant:
Willie Weldon, Mae Brown and Bryan Stirling
Plaintiff:
Jerome Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv03717
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling and Henery McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheftall v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2020cv03441
Plaintiff:
Reginald C Sheftall, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Salley et al
as 3:2020cv03332
Defendant:
B. Salley, State of South Carolina and Bryan Stirling
Plaintiff:
Marcus Albines Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown, Sr. v. Davis et al
as 2:2020cv03107
Defendant:
Warden McDuffie, Captain Thompson, Bryan Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. McMaster et al
as 1:2020cv03024
Defendant:
Governor Henry McMaster, SCDOC Director Bryan P. Stirling, Dr. April Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. James
as 5:2020cv03013
Petitioner:
Bernard Bagley
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, Alan M Wilson and Tonya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv02974
Defendant:
Director Bryan Stirling, Governor Henry McMaster, Dr April Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vernon Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Warden Nelson et al
as 9:2020cv02139
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford, Johah Gabriel and Jahjah T Tishbite
Defendant:
The S.C.D.C Muslim Chaplains, Warden Nelson, S.C.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pierce v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv02070
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
