Cases 81 - 90 of 374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Twin Falls City, et al.
as 1:2021cv00053
Petitioner:
Mathew Pearson
Respondent:
Twin Falls County, Idaho Dept of Corrections, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. City of Twin Falls County et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Respondent:
City of Twin Falls County and Idaho Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rabidue v. Bonner County Administration, et al.
as 2:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Deputy J Thompson, Deputy D Oborn, Deputy Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith W. Rabidue and Keith W. Rabidue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. City of Twin Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Twin Falls County, City of Twin Falls and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrios v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Plaintiff:
Francisco A Barrios
Defendant:
Twin Falls County and Twin Falls City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00487
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Twin Falls City, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Twin Falls City, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Sanchez Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Twin Falls City, et al.
as 1:2020cv00484
Plaintiff:
Mathew M. Pearson
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Twin Falls City, Idaho Dept of Corections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Twin Falls City et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Twin Falls County, Idaho Dept of Corections, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson and Jason Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
