Cases 81 - 90 of 131
Alarcon v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Renato Alarcon
Defendant:
City of Providence, Steven Nunes, Joseph Fontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Howard v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Howard
Defendant:
City of Providence and Mario F. Cirillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ciprian v. The City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Fermin Ciprian
Defendant:
The City of Providence, James J. Lombardi, The Providence School Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kurland et al v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2014cv00524
Plaintiff:
Shannah M. Kurland and Gladys B. Gould
Defendant:
City of Providence, Oscar Perez and Hugh T. Clements, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandes v. South Providence Development Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
Keith Fernandes
Defendant:
South Providence Development Corporation, Victor Realty, RIGP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
City of Providence v. Santander Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
City of Providence
Defendant:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia et al v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Deborah Garcia and Ariel Garcia
Defendant:
City of Providence and John Reposa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzotti v. The City of Providence et al
as 1:2013cv00795
Plaintiff:
Taft Manzotti
Defendant:
The City of Providence, Angel Taveras and Michael Pearis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
