Cases 81 - 90 of 116
CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CHIMENTI , DANIEL LEYVA and DAVID MALDONADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) , JOHN WETZEL , PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. Pennsylvania DOC et al
as 4:2015cv00951
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
Pennsylvania DOC, SCI Coal Township, SCI Graterford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv02561
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC-SCI CHESTER
as 2:2014cv05470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC-SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2014cv05142
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL, PHILLIPS, STOUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWARD v. CORRECTIONS OFFICERS et al
as 5:2014cv02565
Plaintiff:
NOEL LEE COWARD, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICERS, ILLEGAL CUSTODY, UNCONSTITUNAL STRIP SEARCHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OTERO v. KEARES, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv01985
Plaintiff:
JOSE OTERO
Defendant:
KEARES, INC., DOC HOLLIDAY'S STEAKHOUSE INC. and PETER KEARES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robertson v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv00309
Petitioner:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Respondent:
Samuels and DOC of MD., Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robertson v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv00097
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr., Thomas and DOC Commissioner of MD
Plaintiff:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAMPBELL v. WEXFORD CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
VINCENT M. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WEXFORD CORP., MCGARVIE, FERDANKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
