Cases 81 - 90 of 113
Mullikin et al v. Rice et al
as 2:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jason Mullikin
Defendant:
Ron Rice, Justin Horch, Lisa O'Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arvinyl Metal Finishing Group, L.L.C. v. American Commercial Industries, Incorporated et al
as 5:2010fj00007
Plaintiff:
Arvinyl Metal Finishing Group, L.L.C.
Defendant:
American Commercial Industries, Incorporated, American Commercial Holdings, Incorporated, American Commercial Holdings, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Flynn et al v. Shotcrete Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
John Flynn , James Boland , Gerald O'Malley and others
Defendant:
Shotcrete Services, Inc.
Howell v. ssa
as 5:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
Dan Howell
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fitch v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 3:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Dan E. Fitch
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Joshua Pigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Carroll v. Ballou et al
as 6:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Stacy W. Carroll
Defendant:
Dan Ballou and Janie .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. The Sporting News et al
as 4:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Sporting News, Whitney Shaw, Ray Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Clymer et al
as 5:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Leroy Parker
Defendant:
Craig Z. Clymer, Van Newberry, Dan Boaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00025
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
