Cases 81 - 90 of 167
Abraham v. ODOC, et al.
as 2:2013cv00827
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edward Abraham
Defendant:
Ms. Ballard, Stan Czerniak, Dan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
May v. Mahoney
as 3:2013cv00553
Respondent:
Dan Mahoney
Petitioner:
David L. May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wisener v. City of Grants Pass et al
as 1:2013cv00238
Defendant:
City of Grants Pass, Police Officer Dan Evans, Grants Pass Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
William Wisener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A & B Asphalt, Inc. et al v. Humbert Asphalt, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
A & B Asphalt, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Brad Humbert, Dan Humbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Barnes v. Staton
as 3:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Dan Staton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New v. Shelton M.D. et al
as 2:2012cv01726
Defendant:
Dan Dewsnup M.D., Jodean Elliot-Blakeslee M.D., A. Hughes R.N. and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Lawrence New
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv01718
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cunningham
Defendant:
Multnomah County and Dan Staton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dassing v. Kinetic Systems, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01531
Plaintiff:
Dan Dassing
Defendant:
Kinetic Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
New v. Shelton M.D. et al
as 2:2012cv01323
Defendant:
Dan Dewsnup M.D., Jo Elliott-Blakeslee and Steven Shelton M.D.
Plaintiff:
Earl Lawrence New
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
