Cases 81 - 90 of 487
SONDESKY v. CHERRY SCAFFOLDING INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05667
Plaintiff:
LINDA SONDESKY
Defendant:
CHERRY SCAFFOLDING INC. and STEPHEN ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TWARDZIK v. DEVERO et al
as 2:2016cv05436
Plaintiff:
JASON TWARDZIK
Defendant:
ELLIS DEVERO and BRANDON JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamgotchai, et al v. State Horse Racing Commission et al
as 1:2016cv02035
Defendant:
State Horse Racing Commission, Thomas Chuckas, Jr. , Russell C. Redding and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jamgotchian and Eric Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv05084
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM ELLIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, STANZIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONAHUE et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03710
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL DONAHUE , BRIANA DONG , BELINDA DRIVER and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Abrams , James W. Alexander , James F. Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
CROFT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03212
Plaintiff:
ELLIS CROFT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christian v. Green et al
as 3:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Michael Green, James Ellis, Cindy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02679
Petitioner:
ELLIS W. MATHEWS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ELLIS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE ELLIS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY and MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
