Cases 81 - 90 of 202
Curran v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018ct03062
Plaintiff:
John Francis Curran, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bannum, Inc., Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ewing v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018ct03015
Plaintiff:
John Ewing
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Katie M. Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORNELL v. USA, et al.,
as 1:2017cv00878
Petitioner:
LEWIS THOMAS CORNELL
Respondent:
USA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 5:2017hc02102
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshal's Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Joy et al
as 5:2017ct03130
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Joy, C/O McCray, Counselor Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cecil McDonald Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M.D. Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017ct03077
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017ct03076
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC Butner, Logan Graddy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Curran v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017ct03034
Plaintiff:
John Francis Curran, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bannum, Inc., Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Means v. Holland et al
as 5:2016hc02309
Petitioner:
Willie Clay Means
Respondent:
J. Holland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
