Cases 81 - 90 of 5,617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80203
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Parsons
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
