Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Ivey v. Shelton et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Clinton Matthew Ivey
Defendant:
Garrett Shelton, Jr., Lisa Smith, Carlos Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II v. Sebelius
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Amicu:
Ray Elbert Parker, American Center for Law and Justice , Todd Akin and others
Movant:
Steven J. Willis , Eve Ellingwood, American Civil Rights Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Garrett et al
as 2:2009cv00558
Defendant:
Banoro Garrett and Sorento Burns
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Garrett v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 2:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garrett
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00008
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garrett v. Johnson
as 2:2009cv00056
Petitioner:
Gren M. Garrett
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garrett v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2008cv00822
Plaintiff:
Cornell H. Garrett
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia, C. T. Woody, Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garrett et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00792
Plaintiff:
Duane Garrett and Shelby Garrett
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
