Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Weyant v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03249
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gary Weyant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Bradley v. Holder et al
as 8:2010cv00399
Defendant:
Attorney Generals, Jon Burning, County Attorney's and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prokop v. Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission et al
as 4:2010cv03176
Defendant:
Andre Barry, John Bergmeyer, Frank Daley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Prokop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zierke v. USA
as 4:2010cv03178
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Zierke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muse v. Houston
as 4:2010cv03167
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Gary Muse
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00298
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
402) 925-2564 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Micek v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03157
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gary Micek
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Benedict v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 4:2010mc03021
Plaintiff:
Gary-Robert Benedict
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Hogan v. USA
as 8:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
Gary R. Hogan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
