Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Naro v. Patterson et al
as 7:2012cv03986
Plaintiff:
Deborah Naro
Defendant:
Robert B. Patterson, Lee A. Lemaster, Hertz Vehicle, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Block v. Hertz Vehicle LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00676
Plaintiff:
Jim Block
Defendant:
Hertz Vehicle LLC and Hong C. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Adalberto Perez v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2011cv04704
Defendant:
Hertz Vehicles, LLC, Erik Pedersen and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Adalberto Perez
Polonia v. Dunphy et al
as 1:2011cv01563
Plaintiff:
Zuleika Polonia
Defendant:
Robert J. Dunphy , Susan E. Nevins , Hertz Vehicles, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sacca et al v. Kriepke et al
as 3:2010cv00586
Plaintiff:
Robert Sacca and Yvonne Sacca
Defendant:
Kenneth Kriepke and Hertz Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVER v. HERTZ VEHICLE, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv05712
Plaintiff:
LESLIE OLIVER and LESLIE OLIVER
Defendant:
HERTZ VEHICLE, LLC, USA TRUCK, INC. and SAMUEL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PORCO v. FELDMAN et al
as 2:2009cv05607
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE LEPRE PORCO
Defendant:
MARVIN FELDMAN, HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC and ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martinez v. Hertz Vehicles, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04085
Plaintiff:
Agustine Martinez
Defendant:
Hertz Vehicles, LLC and Amit K. Gupta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McKay v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv06110
Plaintiff:
Patricia McKay and Patricia McKay
Defendant:
United States of America, Hertz Corporation and Hertz Vehicle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
