Cases 81 - 90 of 109
Pryor et al v. DR Horton Inc
as 4:2010cv02255
Plaintiff:
Roy Pryor and Sarah Pryor
Defendant:
DR Horton Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moffatt v. Brackett et al
as 9:2010cv01698
Plaintiff:
Keremme Moffatt
Defendant:
Kevin S Brackett, Missy Horton and Marvin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reed v. Lindsey et al
as 4:2009cv03126
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Defendant:
D Lindsey, Sewell, Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cieply et al v. DR Horton Inc
as 6:2009cv02056
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cieply and Lucy Cieply
Defendant:
DR Horton Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Horton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
Mary J Horton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Horton v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2009cv01312
Petitioner:
William G Horton
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Tim Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 7:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Winford Raymond Horton, Jr and Robin E Horton
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
L Dean Weaver Construction Co Inc v. D R Horton Inc
as 4:2008cv04128
Plaintiff:
L Dean Weaver Construction Co Inc
Defendant:
D R Horton Inc and D R Horton Inc
Counter Claimant:
D R Horton Inc and D R Horton Inc
Counter Defendant:
L Dean Weaver Construction Co Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cuellar v. D R Horton Inc
as 3:2008cv04071
Plaintiff:
Fabio Cuellar
Defendant:
D R Horton Inc and D R Horton Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
